In late March 2019, the Hertz Corporation and Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., filed two complaints against its former CEO, CFO, General Counsel and a group president seeking recovery of $70 million in incentive payments and $200 million in consequential damages resulting from Hertz’s 2015 decision to restate its financial statements and an ensuing SEC settlement against Hertz and federal class action lawsuit (which was dismissed).
At the same time, the defendants in those actions each filed separate complaints (which have been consolidated in the Delaware Chancery Court) demanding advancement of their legal fees in the Clawback Proceedings. The litigation between Hertz and its former executives raises novel questions about whether executives have a legally cognizable duty to set the right “tone at the top” and the consequences if they fail to do so. The litigation also raises important and interesting questions regarding clawbacks and indemnification.
Click here, to continue reading on the Cleary M&A and Corporate Governance Watch blog.
This article was republished by Law360 and the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation.